Translate

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Cameroon:Hon. Ayah's Critical Eye on Cameroon's 2011 Budget


2011 BUDGET: THE CAMEROONIAN YOUTHS MORE FRUSTRATED
By AYAH P. ABINE, MP for Akwaya

1) FUEL IN THE 2011 BUDGET – CODE 612
No
Department
2010
2011
%
01
Presidency
3.050.000.000
3.318.307.000
+08.79%
02
- Attached  Services
167.500.000
238.522.000
+42.40%
03
Economic Council
5.000.000
60.000.000
+1100%
04
Prime Minister
237.046.000
232.178.000
-02.05%
05
External Relations
696.000.000
560.239.000
-19.50%
06
Justice
207.819.000
173.859.000
-16.34%
07
Supreme Court
200.000.000
161.000.000
-19.50%
08
Sup State Control
259.500.000
312.000.000
+20.23%
09
National security
1.693.650.000
1.241.652.000
-16.68%
10
Defence
7.273.400.000
8.329.700.000
+14.52%
11
MINATD
13.028.720.000
347.186.000
-97.34%
12
Finance
1.821.661.000
1.316.127.000
-27.75%
13
Economic Planning…
608.598.000
361.929.000
-40.53%
14
Public Service
93.280.000
67.180.000
-27.98%
15
Basic Education
578.540.000
363.374.000
-38.19%
16
Higher Education
99.686.000
58.714.000
-41.10%
17
Scientific Research…
?
74.000.000

18
Secondary Education
2.053.282.000
557.431.000
-72.85%
19
Culture
141.000.000
79.041.000
-43.94%
20
Sports…
112.930.000
68.000.000
-30.78%
21
Communication
87.800.000
60.200.000
-31.43%
22
Youth Affairs
93.050.000
47.700.000
-48.74%
23
Employment…
66.618.000
33.950.000
-49.04%
24
Labour…
91.444.000
80.190.000
-12.31%
25
Social Affairs
132.650.000
49.600.000
-62.61%
26
Women’s Affairs
146.800.000
70.899.000
-51.70%
27
Water and Power
285.000.000
259.000.000
09.12%
28
Public Works
1.976.477.000
372.000.000
-81.18%
29
State Property…
129.771.000
769.000.000
+492.58%
30
Urban Development
224.840.000
769.000.000
+242.02%
31
Post…
286.400.000
202.100.000
-29.43%
32
Transport
443.958.000
60.220.000
-86.43%
33
State Intervention
110.000.000
110.000.000
0%
34
Common Expenditure
1.119.000.000
1.129.000.000
+17.87%
35
Public Health
1.035.417.000
525.650.000
-49.23%
36
Commerce
260.000.000
145.000.000
-44.23%
37
Tourism
198.402.000
123.352.000
-37.83%
38
Environment…
278.150.000
273.819.000
-01.56%
39
Industries…
182.500.000
205.500.000
+12.60%
40
Agriculture…
1.250.327.000
1.107.656.000
-11.41%
41
Livestock…
118.762.000
129.762.000
+09.26%
42
Forestry…
943.500.000
1.000.500.000
+08.81%
43
Small/Medium…
229.500.000
197.000.000
-14.16%
44

40.892.710.000
25.641.537.000
  -37.3%

2) BEYOND COMPREHENSION!
No
Department
2010
2011
%
01
SG Presidency
782.500.000
922.513.000
+17.89%
02
Economic…Council
5.000.000
60.000.000
+1100%
03
Min. Defence
7.273.400.000
8.329.700.000
+14.52%
04
MINATD
13.028.720.000
347.186.000
-97.34%
05
Secondary Education
2.053.282.000
557.431.000
-72.85%
06
Min. Public Works
1.976.477.000
372.000.000
-81.18%
07
Min. Public Health
1.035.417.000
525.650.000
-49.23%
08
Min. State Property
129.771.000
769.000.000
+492.58%
09
Urban Development
224.840.000
769.000.000
+242.02%


03) MISSION ALLOWANCE – 2011 BUDGET – COEDE 617
No
Department
2010
2011
%
01
Presidency
8.270.752.000
8.695.833.000
+05.14%
02
- Attached  Services
857.081.000
857.081.000
0
03
Economic...Council
120.000.000
291.000.000
+142.50%
04
Prime Minister
1.602.953.000
1.510.599.000
-05.76%
05
External Relations
2.200.264.000
1.379.838.000
-37.29%
06
Justice + Sup Court
837.841.000
764.200.000
-08.79%
07
Sup State Control
1.186.500.000
673.500.000
-43.24%
08
National security
1.270.432.000
1.253.932.000
-01.30%
09
Defence
1.830.000.000
8.329.700.000
+355.17%
10
MINATD
885.326.000
578.825.000
-34.62%
11
Finance
3.682.276.000
1.842.941.000
-49.95%
12
Economic Planning…
1.853.600.000
1.007.881.000
-45.63%
13
Public Service
293.565.000
212.015.000
-27.78%
14
Basic Education
2.862.151.000
1.729.718.000
-39.56%
15
Higher Education
906.384.000
398.275.000
-56.10%
16
Scientific Research…
494.500.000
309.000.000
-37.51%
17
Secondary Education
5.009.972.000
1.610.650.000
-67.85%
18
Culture
712.709.000
454.700.000
-36.20%
19
Sports…
8.558.843.000
3.630.566.000
-57.58%
20
Communication
1.602.953.000
228.200.000
-85.76%
21
Youth Affairs
2.200.264.000
582.900.000
-73.51%
22
Employment…
837.841.000
278.468.000
-66.76%
23
Labour…
1.186.500.000
369.109.000
-68.89%
24
Social Affairs
1.270.432.000
282.270.000
-77.78%
25
Women’s Affairs
1.830.000.000
339.326.000
-81.46%
26
Water and Power
712.709.000
420.250.000
-41.03%
27
Public Works
2.608.544.000
665.000.000
-74.51%
28
State Property…
689.484.000
1.030.360.000
+33.08%
29
Urban Development
394.140.000
1.030.360.000
+61.74%
30
Post…
532.600.000
207.200.000
-61.10%
31
Transport
973.347.000
343.859.000
-64.67%
32
State Intervention
145.000.000
145.000.000
0%
33
Common Expenditure
3.874.155.000
3.874.155.000
0%
34
Public Health
2.340.277.000
1.374.006.000
-41.29%
35
Commerce
856.050.000
587.500.000
-31.37%
36
Tourism
370.227.000
255.529.000
-30.98%
37
Environment…
638.477.000
635.165.000
-00.52%
38
Industries…
463.000.000
467.000.000
+00.86%
39
Agriculture…
2.237.197.000
1.817.564.000
-18.76%
40
Livestock…
582.381.000
578.937.000
-00.59%
41
Forestry…
1.245.100.000
1.475.100.000
+18.47%
42
Small/Medium…
661.000.000
532.200.000
-19.49%
43

70.446.327.000
53.049.712.000
-24.69%



 Hon Ayah Paul Abine pointed out last year that by cutting appropriations for fuel in the 2010 budget by half and appropriations for mission allowances by a third, enough money would be saved to employ 3.400 youths at 100.000 francs each per month for ten years. He further argued that the savings could in the alternative enable the construction of 8.000 kilometers of earth roads at 5.000.000 francs per kilometer. The Cameroonian authorities who are hyper-susceptible to criticisms were so stunned that the President of the National Assembly unlawfully bereft Ayah of his parliamentary right to address the House on those lines.
      But Ayah has apparently been vindicated as allocations for fuel in the 2011 budget are down by some 37% ( not too far from the 50% advocated for by Ayah); and those for mission allowances are reduced by almost 25% which is equally close to the 33% targeted by Ayah. The appropriation figures presented by the Government however are but hard facts that the reductions are a right step in the wrong direction.
      To begin with, the reductions are done in such an arbitrary manner that while some ministries have suffered cuts of as much as upwards of 90%, others have gained increase of over 1.000%. For instance, fuel allocation for the Economic and Social Council that seems to be working at a tantalizing celestial plane soared from 5.000.000 in 2010 to an astronomical and staggering amount of 60.000.000 – (1.100%). Contrastingly, fuel allocation for the busy Ministry of Secondary Education is down by 72%.
Harder even to imagine is the increase in the allocation for fuel for the Secretary General at the Presidency of the Republic. From over 782.000.000, meaning that the Secretary General bought fuel for more than 2.100.000 francs every single day of his life in 2010, the appropriation for 2011 has risen to over 922.000.000. In practical terms, the Secretary General shall in 2011 buy fuel for over 2.500.000 francs every one day; that is to say, buying fuel even on Sundays and on public holidays. Economists and moralists may wish to tell the laymen that we are whether this is extravagance or ostentations! Such intervention would be most salutary at a time that the ordinary Cameroonian village woman is unable to buy a daily magi cube of 10 francs for her survival.
      That aside, the analysis of the allocations for mission allowances is not any more equitable or comprehensible. While allocations for the ministries of Communication and Social Affairs have dropped by 85% and 77% respectively, those for the Defence and State Property have risen by 335% and 61%. It is all the more curious that allocations for fuel and mission allowances for the Ministry of Public Health should suffer substantial cuts even in the face of the most serious cholera breakout the fatherland has known for decades. Nor can we the ordinary Cameroonians understand why the Ministry of Public Works, which is the backbone of development, should lose nearly half of its allocations for fuel and mission allowances!
      What is real though is that total cuts in the two budgetary heads amount to 32.647.788.000. That amount can build 6.500 kilometers of earth roads at 5.000.000 francs per kilometer as cost of construction. One would have liked to think that 2011 being an election year, the official calculation would be to put sustained efforts on road infrastructure. That implies empowering the Ministry of Public Works with the provision of sufficient allocations for fuel and mission allowances to ease their movements for the supervision of works on the roads. But as in Cameroon we are reminded in superfluity that the truth and the good example come only from above, the only one option is for the people at the base that we are to applaud and applaud more loudly!
      Yet, we who take an interest in the youths that are the Cameroon of tomorrow may dare ask: where in all this is the place of the youths in whose favour Ayah argued the case for budgetary cuts in 2010? The startling revelation of the figures that follow could well suggest an answer!
      Noteworthy first of all is the fact that not a single ministry bringing up youths or dealing with matters appealing to or touching the youths has suffered anything less than drastic cuts. The Ministry of Higher Education has lost 41% and 56% of its allocations for fuel and mission allowances; the Ministry of Secondary Education: 72% and 67% similarly; the Ministry of Basic Education: 38% and 39%; the Ministry of Youth Affairs: 48% and 73%; and the Ministry of Sports and Physical Education: 30% and 57%. Those figures are telling most clearly that the youths will get frustrated all the more! Could someone be courageous enough to say that even the blind can see the point?
      May we permit ourselves to argue that, as the cuts are apparently consequent on Ayah’s opinion, something dramatic ought necessarily to be done for the youths! To identify with Ayah’s original contention, the total cuts would create jobs for more than 2.700 youths at 100.000 francs each per month for ten years. If the cuts were maintained, youth unemployment would be history in less than five years’ time. That would give more meaning to the dated slogan that the youths are the leaders of tomorrow!
      But curiously, the opposite is true! We take the liberty to illustrate our view with concrete examples. Some two mysterious bodies – State Interventions and “Common” Expenditure – enshrouded in the opaque management of State revenue, have their allocations for fuel and mission allowances either maintained at the 2010 level or increased. The figures themselves should tell the story! State Intervention: 110.000.000 and 145.000.000; “Common” Expenditure: 1.129.000.000 and 3.874.155.000 francs. Could some volunteer expert tell us what these two lions are, and their absolute relevance? More than a big joke, isn’t it? 

SEARCH THIS SITE